Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
A reduce court may well not rule against a binding precedent, regardless of whether it feels that it truly is unjust; it could only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. If the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it could either hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts in the cases; some jurisdictions allow for any judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
ten . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair to the offender along with the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of your Constitution. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion of your employer. However, there might be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more
Many of the volumes (which includes more recent volumes than the library's holdings) are offered online through the Caselaw Access Project.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside of a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically produce exoneration from departmental charges based within the same factual grounds. Although a writ under Article 199 is available in specific limited situations, it truly is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-analyze witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't influence the department of his/her innocence.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents in the boy or Female tend not to approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they can do if they could Reduce off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by regulation.
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling about the same style of case.
The regulation of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it had been the illegal action called regulation of necessity..
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. If the appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then technique the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the 90 times with the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're guided from the decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Dr.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar challenge. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision get more info in applying the regulation. This example of case legislation refers to two cases read while in the state court, within the same level.
Previous 4 tax years interpreted. It's not necessarily from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Criminal cases During the common legislation tradition, courts decide the law applicable to the case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. In contrast to most civil legislation systems, common law systems Keep to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their very own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lessen courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.